1969 Austin Maxi vs. 2006 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2006 Nissan Armada is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 5,555 cc, 2006 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Armada weights approximately 543 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Because 2006 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Austin Maxi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 2006 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Maxi | Armada |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 5555 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 106 L |