1969 Austin Maxi vs. 2008 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2008 Nissan Rogue is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 125 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Nissan Rogue has automatic transmission and 1969 Austin Maxi has manual transmission. 1969 Austin Maxi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Nissan Rogue will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 2008 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Maxi | Rogue |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 1112 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.9 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 60 L |