1969 Austin Maxi vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Dodge Challenger has automatic transmission and 1969 Austin Maxi has manual transmission. 1969 Austin Maxi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Challenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Maxi | Challenger |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.9 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 70 L |