1969 Austin Maxi vs. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 572 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1969 Austin Maxi has manual transmission. 1969 Austin Maxi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 2010 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Maxi | Malibu |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 169 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 1559 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.9 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 61 L |