1969 Austin Maxi vs. 2012 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2012 Cadillac SRX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 953 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 1969 Austin Maxi has manual transmission. 1969 Austin Maxi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 2012 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Maxi | SRX |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 308 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 1940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.9 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 79 L |