1969 Austin Maxi vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 5,935 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage weights approximately 693 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Because 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Aston Martin Vantage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
Make | Austin | Aston Martin |
Model | Maxi | Vantage |
Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 5935 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 510 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4385 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2022 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.9 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 80 L |