1969 Austin Maxi vs. 2013 BMW 1 Series
To start off, 2013 BMW 1 Series is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 BMW 1 Series is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW 1 Series weights approximately 543 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Because 2013 BMW 1 Series is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 BMW 1 Series. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 2013 BMW 1 Series | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | Maxi | 1 Series |
Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4373 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1919 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1408 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.9 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 53 L |