1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1946 Lancia Ardea 3
To start off, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 998 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 weights approximately 36 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | |
| Make | Austin | Lancia |
| Model | Mini Clubman | Ardea 3 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 903 cc |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 28 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 6.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 674 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 29 L |
