1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1949 Buick 40
To start off, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Buick 40 (148 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 1227 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1949 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Austin | Buick |
| Model | Mini Clubman | 40 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 5249 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 87.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 109.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 1865 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3000 mm |
