1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Triumph Renown (66 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Triumph Renown should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Triumph Renown weights approximately 642 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Triumph Renown (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1952 Triumph Renown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | Mini Clubman | Renown |
Year Released | 1969 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2750 mm |