1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1956 Riley RM A
To start off, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,495 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Riley RM A weights approximately 597 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Because 1956 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1956 Riley RM A | |
Make | Austin | Riley |
Model | Mini Clubman | RM A |
Year Released | 1969 | 1956 |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2870 mm |