1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1962 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,183 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Taunus weights approximately 207 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Because 1962 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1962 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Mini Clubman | Taunus |
Year Released | 1969 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2530 mm |