1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1964 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1504 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Because 1964 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1964 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Mini Clubman | DeVille |
Year Released | 1969 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 2050 mm |