1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 532 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1964 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | Mini Clubman | 2000 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 64 L |