1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1966 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc, 1966 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Isuzu Bellel (81 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Isuzu Bellel should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 657 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Isuzu Bellel (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1966 Isuzu Bellel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1966 Isuzu Bellel | |
| Make | Austin | Isuzu |
| Model | Mini Clubman | Bellel |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1991 cc |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 40 L |
