1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 1182 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Because 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
Make | Austin | Oldsmobile |
Model | Mini Clubman | Starfire |
Year Released | 1969 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 6965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 5370 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3130 mm |