1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 302 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Mini Clubman | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1969 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 57 L |