1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 688 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Mini Clubman | Cedric |
Year Released | 1969 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |