1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1972 Citroen SM
To start off, 1972 Citroen SM is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 2,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Citroen SM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Citroen SM (231 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm). This means 1972 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1972 Citroen SM | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | Mini Clubman | SM |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 2668 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 180 HP |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 231 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 86.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 119 km/hour | 218 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2960 mm |
