1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1978 Mercedes-Benz T
To start off, 1978 Mercedes-Benz T is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mercedes-Benz T is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mercedes-Benz T weights approximately 712 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Because 1978 Mercedes-Benz T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mercedes-Benz T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1978 Mercedes-Benz T | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Mini Clubman | T |
Year Released | 1969 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2800 mm |