1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 800 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Because 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1969 Austin Mini Clubman has manual transmission. 1969 Austin Mini Clubman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Austin | Oldsmobile |
Model | Mini Clubman | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1969 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2760 mm |