1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1979 Toyota Starlet
To start off, 1979 Toyota Starlet is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 998 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Toyota Starlet weights approximately 57 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Because 1979 Toyota Starlet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Toyota Starlet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1979 Toyota Starlet | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Mini Clubman | Starlet |
Year Released | 1969 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2310 mm |