1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 1,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 102 weights approximately 136 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Austin | Zastava |
| Model | Mini Clubman | 102 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2160 mm |
