1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1982 Skoda L
To start off, 1982 Skoda L is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 1,046 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Skoda L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Skoda L (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Skoda L should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Skoda L weights approximately 187 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Skoda L (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1982 Skoda L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1982 Skoda L | |
| Make | Austin | Skoda |
| Model | Mini Clubman | L |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 68.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 38 L |
