1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1982 Toyota Celica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 542 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Mini Clubman | Celica |
Year Released | 1969 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2640 mm |