1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1984 Talbot Samba
To start off, 1984 Talbot Samba is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 998 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Austin Mini Clubman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Talbot Samba (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Talbot Samba should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Talbot Samba weights approximately 106 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman (71 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Talbot Samba. (65 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Austin Mini Clubman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Talbot Samba.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1984 Talbot Samba | |
| Make | Austin | Talbot |
| Model | Mini Clubman | Samba |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 65 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 62 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2350 mm |
