1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 1996 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1996 Toyota Crown is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 2,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Crown weights approximately 540 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Because 1996 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 1996 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Mini Clubman | Crown |
Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1770 mm |