1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 647 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Austin Mini Clubman 2002 Nissan X-Trail
Make Austin Nissan
Model Mini Clubman X-Trail
Year Released 1969 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 998 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 39 HP 143 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 71 Nm 192 Nm
Torque RPM 2700 RPM 4000 RPM
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 638 kg 1285 kg
Wheelbase Size 2040 mm 2540 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 60 L