1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 2004 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (195 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1584 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (353 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 2004 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Mini Clubman | Express |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 102.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 2222 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 117 L |