1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 242 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1760 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Austin | Land Rover |
| Model | Mini Clubman | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 282 HP |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 100 L |
