1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 954 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (264 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Mini Clubman | CTS |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 264 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 1592 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 64 L |