1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 2005 Citroen C1
To start off, 2005 Citroen C1 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C1 (53 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C1 should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C1 weights approximately 242 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C1 (132 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 2005 Citroen C1 | |
Make | Austin | Citroen |
Model | Mini Clubman | C1 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 71 Nm | 132 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |