1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 242 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Mini Clubman | UTE |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 71 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |