1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 2010 Scion tC
To start off, 2010 Scion tC is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Scion tC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Scion tC (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Scion tC (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2010 Scion tC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 2010 Scion tC | |
Make | Austin | Scion |
Model | Mini Clubman | tC |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 55 L |