1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 2011 Ford Ka
To start off, 2011 Ford Ka is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 2011 Ford Ka | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Mini Clubman | Ka |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 40 L |