1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Mini Clubman | Micra |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 71 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 46 L |