1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 813 kg more than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Austin | Volvo |
| Model | Mini Clubman | C30 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 638 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |
