1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (99 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (130 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Mini Clubman | Aveo |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 71 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 46 L |