1969 Austin Mini Clubman vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Mini Clubman would be higher.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (130 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. (71 Nm). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Mini Clubman. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1969 Austin Mini Clubman has manual transmission. 1969 Austin Mini Clubman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Mini Clubman | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Austin | Smart |
| Model | Mini Clubman | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 1867 mm |
