1969 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1972 Mazda 616
To start off, 1972 Mazda 616 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda 616 (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1969 Autobianchi A 112. (41 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 1969 Autobianchi A 112. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda 616 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1969 Autobianchi A 112. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda 616 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Autobianchi A 112. (69 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda 616 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Autobianchi A 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Autobianchi A 112 | 1972 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Mazda |
| Model | A 112 | 616 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 78.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 655 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2480 mm |
