1969 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2000 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 2000 Marcos Mantis is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Marcos Mantis (506 HP) has 465 more horse power than 1969 Autobianchi A 112. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1969 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2000 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Marcos Mantis (613 Nm) has 544 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Autobianchi A 112. (69 Nm). This means 2000 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Autobianchi A 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Autobianchi A 112 | 2000 Marcos Mantis | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Marcos |
| Model | A 112 | Mantis |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 506 HP |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 613 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2290 mm |
