1969 Autobianchi Primula vs. 2005 Jaguar S-Type

To start off, 2005 Jaguar S-Type is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar S-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar S-Type (391 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 334 more horse power than 1969 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar S-Type should accelerate faster than 1969 Autobianchi Primula. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar S-Type weights approximately 1011 kg more than 1969 Autobianchi Primula. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Autobianchi Primula 2005 Jaguar S-Type
Make Autobianchi Jaguar
Model Primula S-Type
Year Released 1969 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1221 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 57 HP 391 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 3500 RPM
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 834 kg 1845 kg
Vehicle Length 3800 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1590 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2310 mm 2920 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 70 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]