1969 Bizzarrini Manta vs. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bizzarrini Manta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bizzarrini Manta would be higher. At 5,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Bizzarrini Manta (350 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. (255 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Bizzarrini Manta should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Bizzarrini Manta (510 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro. (380 Nm). This means 1969 Bizzarrini Manta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Bizzarrini Manta | 1996 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Chevrolet |
Model | Manta | Camaro |
Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 5731 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 380 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2750 mm |