1969 BMW 1600 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1969 BMW 1600 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1969 BMW 1600. (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1969 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1199 kg more than 1969 BMW 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 BMW 1600 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 1600 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 5979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 2195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3300 mm |
