1969 BMW 1600 vs. 1967 BMW 2000
To start off, 1969 BMW 1600 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 BMW 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 BMW 2000 weights approximately 104 kg more than 1969 BMW 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 1600 | 1967 BMW 2000 | |
Make | BMW | BMW |
Model | 1600 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 70 L |