1969 BMW 1600 vs. 1974 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1974 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1969 BMW 1600. (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1969 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1334 kg more than 1969 BMW 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 BMW 1600 | 1974 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 1600 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1974 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 7732 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 193 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 2330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3390 mm |
