1969 BMW 1600 vs. 1985 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1969 BMW 1600. (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1969 BMW 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 BMW 1600. (160 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 BMW 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1969 BMW 1600 | 1985 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 1600 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1969 | 1985 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2833 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2580 mm |