1969 BMW 1600 vs. 1996 Ford Saetta
To start off, 1996 Ford Saetta is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 BMW 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 BMW 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 BMW 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Saetta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 BMW 1600 | 1996 Ford Saetta | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 1600 | Saetta |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2780 mm |
