1969 BMW 1600 vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 BMW 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 BMW 1600 (98 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 BMW 1600 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 BMW 1600 weights approximately 346 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 BMW 1600 | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | BMW | MCC |
| Model | 1600 | Smart |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1460 mm |
