1969 BMW 1600 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1969 BMW 1600. (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU should accelerate faster than 1969 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 909 kg more than 1969 BMW 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 BMW 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 BMW 1600. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 BMW 1600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 BMW 1600 | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | BMW | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 1600 | SSU |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 71 L |
